The concept of the Factory Greenhouse, Australia and Biodiesel Fuel Production.

Consider that the term 'bio-fuel' doesn’t only allude to Ethanol. This as there seems, too quickly, mention of Ethanol as 'the biofuel' otherwise ...avoided is notice of Bio-Oil and the far more efficient compression combustion of the Diesel Process;

http://www.gm.com/corporate/responsibility/reports/05/400_products/2_twenty/421.html

'… the diesel engine operates more efficiently, and diesel fuel provides more power than gasoline, compressed natural gas or ethanol. ...'

• Bio-Oil fuel production can utilise 'weeds' and can be requiring of minimal 'management', as opposed otherwise to 'food cropping' effort.
  
• Bio-Oil production would be capable of using non-arable land, this being shown in activities of other’s efforts already.

The 'Fuel Factory' becomes then a 'Factory Greenhouse' ...using of that CO2 made by the nearby Coal or Gas Utility …to increase growth rates of the 'weeds' being cultivated within.

CO2, when channeled into the increased productivity of the 'Factory Greenhouse', is an asset for growth processes. When being grown in a 'Factory Greenhouse', kilometre long hedge rows can have new tip growth and seeds removed / harvested on a large scale and readily.

More rapid recovery of these plants, under such growing conditions, will see rapid regrowth and higher yield. However, the 'grand issue' that 'AGW platforming' (Climatism) tries to make for itself would notice only 'model makings' ...only avoiding regard of the actual Environment.

Of that CO2 been noted as ‘added’ to the Atmosphere ‘recently’ there's been no ‘CO2 warming' ...whilst of the pre-existing ‘warming trend’ regard;

http://thenewamerican.com/node/6973#SlideFrame_1

'... A roughly linear global temperature increase of about 0.5°C per 100 years seems to have occurred from about 1800, or even much earlier, to the present. This value may be compared with what the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) scientists consider to be the manmade greenhouse effect of 0.6°C per 100 years. This long-lasting linear warming trend is likely to be a natural change. ...'

Only a few years ago was I mentioning of Power Stations become surrounded by trees and fields. This as

• CO2 isn't a 'dangerous' gas, its plant food.

(Do please notice then http://www.abc.net.au/landline/content/2006/s2247329.htm and the Greenhouse growing of Tomatoes (in South Australia), using of 'quadruple' CO2 levels and of which do the Plants seem very appreciative of!)

Will the ‘Factory Greenhouse' then ‘be there' also? It certainly should be, as in surrounding of the Utility can ‘Power Companies’ sell directly their CO2 into the Factory Greenhouse. This to improve production volume of Bio-Fuel Oil and off-set 'Generation Costs' of Electricity.

The use of the Castor Oil plant (and other suitable plants/weeds) in such enclosed situations can overcome the 'weed status' such suffer of generally, also. The use of non-arable land remains highly viable for making of a high value product, being 'bio-diesel' fuel.

Such can be located close to Coal and Gas fuelled Utilities for 'maximum efficiency' whilst the 'weeds' can only grow faster ...and 'healthy weeds' will put more seed. It’s the 'seed' needed to make Bio-fuel Oil and it’s a volume of Bio-Oil needed to make a volume of Bio-Diesel.

Again I would state that its my hope to see such large Factory Greenhouse attached to Coal and Gas utilities and making of Bio-oil for Fuel Production, and is truely 'the sooner the better' the case for both the Environment and the People of this great Nation that is Australia.

Yours, Peter K. Anderson (a.k.a. Hartlod™)